Fr.Anthony Musaala … “ostracized” for publicizing priest sexual abuse in Uganda 2

The final chapter to the explosive revelations of some weeks ago about Catholic sexual abuse in Uganda and rampant sexual activity by priests with women is yet to be written.

Here is an addition to the saga from Los Angeles, narrating Father Musaala’s travails since the letter he wrote to the Catholic hierarchy in Rubaga was leaked. It makes for uncomfortable but predictable reading. The Catholic Church in Uganda seems to have acted as was to be expected -  by hiding their heads in the sand, laying the grounds for what is only likely to amount to a bromide, and punishing  the messenger.

**********************

The Catholic Church suspends Anthony Musaala indefinitely for shining a light on what he calls an open secret: Sex abuse is a problem in Africa too.

By Robyn Dixon, Los Angeles Times

 May 4, 2013, 6:10 p.m.

 KAMPALA, Uganda — He is a celebrity across eastern and central Africa, a gospel music star known to many as the “Dancing Priest.” But for years he also was a keeper of painful secrets — his own and many others’.

In going public, Anthony Musaala has forced the Roman Catholic Church in Uganda to confront a problem it had insisted didn’t exist. And he may stir a debate far beyond Africa’s most Catholic of countries.

The Ugandan priest has been suspended indefinitely by the archbishop of Kampala for exposing what he calls an open secret: Sex abuse in the Catholic Church is a problem in Africa as well as in Western Europe and North America.

The African Catholic Church is fast-growing, pious and traditional. As the church elsewhere forks out billions of dollars to compensate the child sex abuse victims of priests, few African Catholics have questioned the assumption, voiced recently by Ghanaian Cardinal Peter Turkson, that the African church is purer than its counterpart in the West, which is regarded as secular and permissive.

It’s not more pure, says Musaala. He says he has the evidence to prove it.

“The Vatican turns a blind eye because it doesn’t want to be embarrassed about this blooming church. But I think it’s time we had the truth,” Musaala says.

In March, he wrote to the archbishop of Kampala, Cyprian Lwanga, about priests who fathered children, kept secret wives or abused girls or boys, and called for a debate on marriage for priests.

One of the cases of abuse he cited involved himself. He was one of numerous boys sexually abused at 16, he says, by Catholic brothers at one of Uganda’s best boarding schools. He also alleged several other cases of child sex abuse in his letter.

“Wherever you go, people know about this. It’s like an open secret. People know. Nothing is ever done,” said Musaala in an interview.

The letter was leaked to the news media. And in response, Lwanga suspended Musaala, saying his statements stirred up contempt for the Catholic Church and damaged the morale of believers.

Later in the month, Lwanga acknowledged that abuses had taken place, apologized to victims and set up an internal inquiry. But he did not backtrack on Musaala’s unpaid suspension.

Lwanga’s limited concession came after South African Cardinal Wilfrid Napier of Durban said in a BBC interview that he had dealt with cases of child sex abuse, which were handled by the church internally, and not referred to the police. He suggested that the perpetrators weren’t criminals and needed counseling.

“Some of the priests went, according to the wisdom of the time … for treatment, came back and have been under — what we call it — personal surveillance and have functioned quite normally ever since,” he said. Napier later apologized, but also accused the BBC of twisting his words in the radio interview.

For African Catholics, the revelations of child sex abuse in Western churches are shocking enough. But the idea that African priests might be sexually abusing boys had been unthinkable. Paradoxically, many believers in Africa are aware that some priests break their vows and father children, but talking about it is taboo.

Catholicism is the most popular religion in Uganda. In the center of the hilly capital, the faithful gather daily at Christ the King Church, and so many touch the foot of a large statue of Christ that its shiny toes gleam in the sunlight.

Parishioner Stephen Sanya, 68, a retired postal worker, said it was common knowledge that some Ugandan priests have sex, or, as he put it, “serve nature” instead of God.

“There are cases where [priests] indulge in these things. I have seen and heard of cases,” said Sanya, dawdling in the warm afternoon sun after dropping in to pray. “It’s scandalizing. I suggest that if a priest is not ready to be celibate, he can resign and get married. But I haven’t seen that happening in Uganda. Here, it’s secret.”

Anyone who calls for these embarrassing secrets to be brought to light, placing the church in an awkward position, doesn’t get much sympathy from Uganda’s conservative churchgoers, even if the allegations are true. To traditionalists, what Musaala is doing is un-African.

But then, Musaala is the kind of man who doesn’t exactly fit in, and perhaps it took an outsider like him to toss out the first allegations.

Educated in Britain for many years, he’s a creature of two worlds, not completely at home in either. His clipped British accent and his quaint turn of phrase mark him as an outsider in his home country. His attitudes, and his soaring sense of individual freedom also are imports.

Related articles

Archbishop Cyprian Lwanga responds to Father Musaala 14

Here is the Archbishop of Kampala’s press release. It’s not clear whether this was before or after Father Musaala was suspended from conducting his priestly duties ‘pending investigations.’

************************************

Archbishop Cyprian Lwanga

Archbishop Cyprian Lwanga

PRESS RELEASE

Dear people of God

“I deeply think of the immense suffering caused by the article produced in the media authored by Fr. Anthony Musaala, that seems to be casting a dark shadow of suspicion” over all priests.

Above all, the Church takes seriously the allegations in this article. On behalf of my fellow Catholic Bishops in Uganda I wish to assure the public that as leaders of the Catholic Church in Uganda; we are committed to the protection of the minors and rights of everyone. Investigations about these allegations are to begin immediately with of course cases that are proved.

It should however, be clear to everyone that the value of the choice of priestly celibacy according to the Catholic tradition still stands, and the need for solid human and Christian formation is underlined, both for seminarians and for those already ordained.
The Catholic Church’s Code of Canon Law states the stand of the Catholic Church on celibacy in Canon 277, which mandates clerical celibacy that: “Clerics are obliged to observe perfect and perpetual continence for the sake of the Kingdom of Heaven and therefore are obliged to observe celibacy, which is a special gift of God, by which sacred ministers can adhere more easily to Christ with an undivided heart and can more freely dedicate themselves to the services of God and mankind.”

This Church law is embraced willingly as prescribed by Can.1037 which states that: “A candidate for the permanent diaconate who is not married, and likewise a candidate for the priesthood, is not to be admitted to the order of diaconate unless he has, in the prescribed rite, publically before God and the Church undertaken the obligation of celibacy, or unless he has taken perpetual vows in a religious institute”. This means therefore that no one is forced to embrace this discipline before or at ordination.

Everyone should once again remember that until Christ came along (Mt 19:12), and then Paul (1 Cor. 7:32-35), the only state of life known was marriage but when Christ came, He made it clear that some people would remain celibate (“eunuchs”) for the sake of the Kingdom of God (Mt 19:12). St. Paul further recommended it for those who would be dedicated to serving God in this world (1 Cor. 7:7, 17, 32-35), for the salvation of souls and it is totally a freedom of choice as the above biblical quotations suggest.
If one fails to comply with this discipline, he does it on his own and not on behalf of the Church. Consequently personal failure in this regard is not an offence sanctioned by the Church. However we as Bishops deeply regret such failures and seek forgiveness from those who have been victims.
I indeed applaud all the many religious men and women who have remained faithful to this promise and there is nothing we can offer but our prayers for them.

It is very unfortunate that the author of the published document stands to call for suspension of this discipline through his proposed forum that has no Church legitimacy and yet the Church’s legislation and practice is clear on this point. None-the-less we are going to investigate into the allegations in the article with people concerned together with certainty of the author of this document.

As per now, after the acceptance of Fr. Musaala that he authored this document, the law prescribed by the Church in can. 1369 takes its course. This law states that: “A person is to be punished with a just penalty, who, at a public event or assembly, or in a published writing, or by otherwise using the means of social communication, utters blasphemy, or gravely harms public morals, or rails at or excites hatred of or contempt for religion or the Church.”

This means therefore that Fr. Musaala because of the publication of his article in the public media which damages good morals of Catholic believers and further expresses a wrong teaching against the Catholic Church’s teaching and that this stirs up hatred and contempt against the Church, he incurs a Ferendae sententiae penalty as prescribed by Can.1314. This means that Father Anthony Musaala is suspended from celebrating sacraments and sacramentals, from the powers of governance in accordance to the law of the Church Can.1335 and1336§1n.1, 2and3 as investigations are being carried on.

Once more I feel sorry of the inconveniences caused by this article and let us entrust the whole matter to our Lord the most chaste, for the conversion of hearts to do good.

Yours Sincerely in Christ,

+Cyprian K. Lwanga
ARCHBISHOP OF KAMPALA

The lunacy and Hypocrisy of Catholic Priest Celibacy 7

Money quote:

Indeed everyone needs to live with his fellow human beings, experience feelings, love and be loved. That is precisely why God put us on this earth for a season; to live as happy a life as possible, while being loved by and loving those around us. Once we are gone, there is no return.

The Catholic Church opted to impose an artificial construct on its priests on the clearly spurious grounds that Christ lived a celibate life. But Christ attended a wedding and even conjured wine from water so that the occasion might be a merry one. And there is no single verse in the Bible where Jesus calls for celibacy; none. So, where on earth does the Catholic Church get it that its ministers must not indulge in the absolutely glorious pleasures of the flesh? Might not this be a case of an overbearing organization being a spoil-sport?

That said, the Catholic Church is a private club of sorts that anyone can opt in or out of. Anyone who opts in, and then goes ahead to sign up for the priestly vocation has to adhere to the Catholic Church’s bizarre requirement for one to inflict pain upon oneself for the benefit of … the Catholic Church.

Women who fall in love with priests end up getting a raw deal as the NPR program shows clearly. But even the priests who try to stay loyal to the vows of celibacy end up tearing themselves up in knots over those self-same vows, and often fall off the straight and narrow, and have affairs with fellow men, women and, tragically, children.

The call for celibacy clearly makes no sense whatever. But it also makes no sense that anyone who has no intention of remaining celibate should join the priesthood. What exactly do they hope to achieve? And how can anyone, male or female, who  vows to be celibate and then indulges in unfettered sexual activity live with his conscience? Why not live a more honest life by walking away from the straight jacket that is Catholic celibacy as some have done?

It would appear, therefore, that asking men and women to abstain from sex is a foolish conceit that the Catholic Church continues to insist on at its own peril. It is unnatural not to have sex if one has the desire for it. It is to relegate grown men and women to sado-masochistic tendencies to ask them to eschew the joys of sexual union with other human beings.

A life without any kind of sex?. Jesus never recommended it. If anyone knows where such a life is recommended in the Bible, please point it out.

In the meantime, it stands to reason that we should all live and … let live.

PS: I first posted this article in 2010. Sadly, for the Catholic Church, it is still totally valid today.

Pope Benedict XVI: India Knight Voices My Very Thoughts 3

India Knight had a great piece, three years ago on why she had let her Catholicism lapse:

Money quote:

Vague because it’s hard to pay lip-service to a faith that you feel hates you; a faith that would rather let you die in childbirth than have an abortion, won’t let you take the contraception necessary to prevent said abortion, hates gay people despite having many homosexual priests; a faith that talks ignorant nonsense about HIV and Aids, that would rather watch people die in Africa than let them use a condom; a faith that is unbelievably slow to say sorry about the fact that some of its members are habitual rapists of children.

I mean, you know, at some point you just give up. Not one of these things is defensible taken individually. Collectively, they are beyond comprehension.

My thoughts exactly. This Pope has been an unmitigated failure, with his reign characterized by cover-ups, even rewarding, of priestly pedophilia, foolish resistance to contraception by a Pope who has never raised a child or had to worry about where his next meal would come from, publicly inveighing against homosexuals while continuing to secretly hire them into the priestly ranks … one could go on.

The only positively radical thing Benedict XVI has done in his entire Papacy is to resign. Time for a Pope ready to live in the 21st Century.

To a gay man living in 201013, the Catholic Church Vatican I see and read about is an abomination.

Related reading:

.1. Pedophilia, celibacy and the priestly vocation
2. Is the notion of a sexually active gay clergy tenable?
3. If Biblical teaching is unquestionable …
4. Stephen Fry on the Catholic Church
.

Toddler preaches: “Aint no homos gonna make it to heaven”

If you ever doubted that, like racism, homophobia is taught (and learned), here is evidence that shows it is not empty talk to attribute both vices to  parenting and/or upbringing.

Money quote from a near-toddler, a child so young he is barely out of diapers:

“I know the Bible’s right, somebody’s wrong…ain’t no homos gonna make it to heaven.”

Especially note how the adults work themselves into a hysterical frenzy, thereby emboldening the child to repeat himself.

There is of course no way a child that young can know how to interpret the Bible or be able to speak in such an adult manner. The adults who gave this child that standing ovation have questions to answer to their consciences.

Now, for the parents that tutored this child to stand before an audience and speak this way … one has to wonder what their Jesus would say to them.

That, possums, is how racists and homophobes come to be – with the express help from our parents and/or those who bring us up.

Enough on this already.

 

The Gay Christian Watch oxymoron

Darian Aaron: branded a pornographic, lustful, perverted liar by GCM

The predominantly white Gay Christian  Movement Watch knows exactly what is good for all black people in the world – and they are not afraid to say it.

There I was thinking that Christians follow Jesus (who never said a word about homosexuals or homosexuality) because his overwhelming message was one of love, tolerance, inclusiveness and leaving the final arbitration to God.

Reading this Gay Christian Movement Watch [GCM] article, you might be forgiven for thinking that GCM wrote their own Bible and are now disappointed that Ebony Magazine is not waving it  with them along  their road of cant pontificating.

It is tough stuff and the particularly stomach-churning point is when a white commentator decides that he is qualified to lecture inclusive black churches:

After I became a Christian, I had (and still have) enormous respect for the African-American Christian community for standing strong on traditional Christian morality. The gay community can say its backwards or oppressive or whatever, but I really respect that strong, group-level acceptance of God’s Word.  As a man who grew up in PCUSA, I know what happens when a church becomes a social club by abandoning God’s wisdom. So, even though I’m white, I find this sort of thing very sad. Black churches are being pushed to be “tolerant” of a very serious sin, all in the name of “love” or whatever. (Comments)

Even if the parable of the pig wasn’t insulting enough in of itself, it is difficult to see how anyone could be more condescending. Black churches are being pushed to be tolerant? With what are they being pushed? Bulldozers or gay “fornication?” Should we thus assume that inclusive black churches have no minds of their own, have no ability to interpret the Bible and need lectures from white Christians to see the light?

And if you are not going to be tolerant in the name of love, what on earth are you professing to be Christian for?

Check out Darian Aaron’s blog here.

Catholic Bishop resigns over siring children

Here is yet another example of the hypocrisy that led me to let my Catholicism lapse.

Money quote from Yahoo:

There is more on the sad story  here

As a gay man, the Catholic Church doesn’t speak to my aspirations at all. I argued as much some months ago. As a human being, their laws of celibacy do not make the least bit of sense to me either. This man, Bishop Gabino Zavala, 60, has been ministering for decades, without incident that would threaten his flock. And now he has to resign his vocation over an issue that wasn’t hurting anyone?

Forced out: Bishop Gabino Zavala

What kind of logic is this Church using? Anyway, what kind of organization in 2012 still thinks that an adult fathering a child makes one unfit for office? That thinking belongs in the dark ages in my judgment.

The truth, of course, is that the Pope knows that if all the priests who have fathered children (or who are having sex with men and women) were to resign, the Catholic Church would have a labor crisis of seismic proportions. He must know this which is why you will hear no investigations into priests who are sexually active or who have children; the Catholic Church cannot afford to confirm the truth staring it in the face. They simply wait until a priest is outed and then they act, but they will not preempt an investigation.

That, indeed, was the same attitude this same Church adopted where the sexual abuse of children in America, Ireland, England, Germany etc. was concerned. They took a piece-meal approach towards the investigations because to have accepted that every diocese in every country where a complaint has been lodged should be investigated would have uncovered a scandal so huge it would likely have submerged the Vatican forever. So, they chose the easy way out; moving the priests around, mollycoddling others into retirement and only investigating the most pernicious or persistent complaints.

That is the reason why you have heard barely a murmur about sexual abuse in the Catholic Church in Africa; no one there has yet had the guts to come out and complain because even if they did, they know they wouldn’t be taken seriously.  Africans, already cowed into meekness by their upbringing, are raised to view the Church and all religions as sacrosanct. To complain about a priest regarding anything is tantamount to declaring war on everyone who believes in that Church.  No African can dare do it – yet.

But, of course, the abuse has taken place and must be taking place. In high school, the stories of brothers (brothers, too, are bound by a vow of celibacy) fondling boys and worse were legion. AfroGay experienced that sort of thing first hand, too. No, he will not complain because, having realized at 9 that he was gay, he didn’t mind what happened – indeed he welcomed it. AfroGay also knows of priests and brothers who regularly had sex with the nuns and other women; we reveled in peeping through keyholes and listening against doors when the sex was going on. The rumors of priests who fathered children were too many to be just idle chatter. AfroGay knows at least one adult gay man today who has a very healthy father/son relationship with a Catholic prelate who has since retired.

And this Church still wants to justify hanging on to the diktat of priestly celibacy? Psst.

Related reading:

1. Is a sexually active Catholic clergy tenable?
2. Pedophilia, celibacy and the priestly vocation
3. The Pope, celibacy and contraception
4. The Rev. Henry Willenborg
5. Sex and the Single Priest – Father Alberto Cutie
6. The lunacy and hypocrisy of priestly celibacy

The Bible and Sexuality

Amy Levine and Douglas Knight have an excellent piece in the Huffington Post about the dangers of placing all stock in Biblical lore where forming one’s opinions about sexuality is concerned.

Money quote:

It would be interesting, it is always interesting, to hear the counter arguments to that one. So far as AfroGay knows there has never been a coherent one.

Am I Damned?

“When one person suffers from a “delusion” it is called insanity. When many people suffer from a “delusion” it’s called religion.” Robert M Pirsing

 I go to Church willingly for a totally selfish reason: if I am sure the choir is great because I love choral music.

Failing that, I go if I am invited to a wedding, if yet another happy family is baptizing their little bundle of joy or if someone has died and there is a service to send them off.  To me, these are events that enhance social cohesion, making it important that one should attend them regardless of whether one is religious or not. So, it would be churlish, if not needlessly unsocial, to ignore them.

Else, I see no point in going to Church. If that Church is avowedly anti-gay, then attending it would be no different to masochism – inflicting pain upon oneself due something you have denied yourself or wish to deny yourself. Yet, I am no masochist and so I shall certainly never put myself in a position where I punish myself to please others.

You see, I gave up on believing in religion many years ago because it became apparent to me that religion is there to pigeon-hole human beings into these slots that help the respective faiths count heads and congratulate themselves on the numbers they have. I imagine that the Catholic Church constantly pats itself on the back when it leafs through its statistics showing that it has billions of followers, and dollars to boot, many of them from disease infested backwaters, with barely an education and, thus, as vulnerable as they are impressionable. Islam, too, I should think, is proud of the hundreds of millions that bend over in supplication five times a day in deference to Allah. All power to them.

Religion has nothing to offer me whatever. The reason for this is simple – ever since I could think critically, I realized that, indeed, religion has been used to divide and conquer rather than unite. Africa is a good example where the Christian missionaries arrived with their Bibles, exhorted the natives to turn the other cheek while their land was being stolen by colonialists and soon the continent had been carved up by Britain, France, Germany, the Netherlands and Portugal – a wrong that likely can never ever be put right. The Bible did indeed pave way for the sword.

On a more personal note, I am quite convinced that, in total rejection of what it should be used for, religion is used to propagate hatred and bigotry; of homosexuals in my case. As India Knight put it many moons ago, it is difficult to pay lip service to a [religion] that you feel hates you. I would hate to sit in a church and squirm while a preacher I know dabbles in gay acts, or half of whose choir are my gay friends, reads verses from a Bible that reduces all homosexuals to abominations. But that is the type of barefaced hypocrisy that has happened more times than I care to enumerate. Yes, there are churches that have chosen to be inclusive by embracing gays up to and including marrying them. But it’s not lost on me that that they are considered renegades and they wouldn’t have a leg to stand on if they had to follow the letter of the Old Testament where homosexuality is concerned.

Someone needs to explain to me, then, why in order to live the everlasting life that the Bible promises, I should attend fringe churches that have rebelled against certain tenets of a book the rest of whose contents they believe. I agree that if you are to believe in the Bible, you can’t pick and choose what you take. If it is indeed the word of God, and I have my views about that, then you accept it as is. Of course it is not intelligent to treat any book written by man like that but when has any religion ever put critical thinking above blind, visceral, feelings or emotions?

That is the other reason why I don’t believe in religion. Religion requires me not to be critical, not to think for myself, not to reject any anything from its written texts – in other words, religion demands that I should eschew my intelligence in favor of … blind faith. At this point in my life, believing blindly would go against every part of my character – a character given to me by God if religion is to be believed – and I don’t see how that would make an honest person out of me. So, better to refuse to believe blindly, and be damned by religion, than to follow like a goat and be damned by my conscience.

It seems as if I am damned if I do, and I am damned if I don’t.

"Pastor Skinner" Joins Uganda’s Cabal of Anti-Gay Bigots 3

Check out this site showing the ugly face of the frothing-at-the-mouth anti-gay prelates in Uganda. It is distressing, though not terribly surprising that Gary Skinner of Watoto Children’s Choir fame sits squarely among this group of infamy. After all, we are the company we keep.

Here is the motley crew of self-confessed anti-gay bigots whose company Gary Skinner keeps:

Bishop Simon Peter Emiau – Chairman Evangelical Fellowship of Uganda; His Grace Luke Henry Orombi – Archbishop of Church of Uganda; Pastor Jotham Mutebi – Chairman Full Gospel Churches of Uganda; Pastor Titus Oundo – Chairman Diliverance Churches of Uganda; Apostle John Mulinde – World Trumpet Mission; Apostle Jackson Ssenyonga – Christian Life Ministries; Pastor Gary Skinner – Watoto (formerly Kampala Pentecostal) Church; Apostle Joseph Ssewadda – General Overseer of Born Again Federation; Peter Asiimwe – Uganda Evangelical Mission Agency; Pastor Fred Wantaate – Coordinator for Pentecostal Golden Jubilee – Full Gospel Church;
“You are the company you keep”
 ’Pastor’ Gary Skinner

Gary Skinner, of course, keeps children, some as young as five years, on the road for months on end, performing (rather than attending school or going to bed at Godly hours) at fund-raising evangelical concerts that often run six months without a break. Then there is the pretense that Watoto has always cultivated that all the children in the Watoto Choir are orphans, something that is patently ridiculous.

Let’s face it: Skinner has gained handsomely from what is surely tantamount to child labor, albeit of a vocal kind. 

And we know that his Kampala Pentecostal Church has endorsed anti-gay stances in the past so perhaps this latest hot poker on our backsides (pun intended) should come as no surprise.

Related Reading:

1. Joyce Meyer condemns Uganda’s anti-gay bill

.